On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) < bjor...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Matthew Walker <mwal...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > > "I'm totally cool with the idea of code review for Gadgets & so forth, > just > > not using Gerrit. We considered it for Scribunto (and heck, I wrote half > of > > a > > proof of concept) but shot it down because the idea totally sucked." > > > > Chad, can you expand on that statement. > > I'm not Chad, but one of the big issues is this: Consider the trouble > that some of us as developers have using Git and Gerrit. Now think > about trying to get non-developer JS and CSS coders to be able to use > Git and Gerrit, much less to *want* to use Git and Gerrit rather than > torches and pitchforks. > That's a big part of it. The other part is that Gadgets and site CSS/JS stuff has always been a system that empowers wikis to make their own changes quickly. Gerrit may produce better reviewed code, but it's certainly not a rapid process. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
