Yes that sounds pretty good to me, I also think it would be much better for this to be handled on client side, I don't really see any problem with caching, but what I am not sure is if this could be implemented without having to update the articles with some magic words etc. But even if we had to, it still would be just a one time update.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Gabriel Wicke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/17/2014 02:11 PM, Petr Bena wrote: >> it can't be done client side. It must be done on both sides, so that >> user can save their preference into database without having to set it >> everytime they get their cookies wiped (which in my case is like 10 >> times a day just by switching devices and browsers) > > Sorry if I wasn't clear; yes, saving the preference is fine. I am mainly > concerned about keeping the page content independent of the preference, > so that we can serve the same cached content to anonymous and logged-in > users. Currently that is not yet possible, but we are working on > eliminating the last preference dependencies so that logged-in users can > get the same performance as anonymous users. > > Gabriel > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
