Hoi,
Just a question, the WMF has invested a lot of effort in producing fonts
for many of the languages it supports. These fonts are better than the
fonts used in packages like Ubuntu.
Is there a problem in using the WMF supported font ? It certainly makes the
inconsistency in Ubuntu moot.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 28 January 2014 00:16, Marco Fleckinger <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
> "C. Scott Ananian" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >I don't happen to know the Fedora packages, but I'd be glad to add
> >them to the README when you get a set which works.
> >
> may you also add it to the article:
>
> https://mediawiki.org/wiki/PDF_rendering/Installation/en
>
> >Unfortunately, the hard parts are identifying all the font packages,
> >as package names for non-latin fonts seem to be wildly inconsistent
> >even between different Ubuntu releases. :(
>
> Hm interesting. Concerning Tex everything went quite for me on Debian,
> although Matthew shared Ubuntu's packet names. Is this relevant to the
> article as well?
>
> Marco
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
