fde#@%62jtgjsl$#5kgsgjgseojgro@#$%SEGsgesjojahREAGHkerahj23YJ34pwyjw3$#^WrejgshSH
Time Required to Exhaustively Search this Password's Space: Online Attack Scenario: 5.04 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries Offline Fast Attack Scenario: 50.42 million trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries Massive Cracking Array Scenario: 50.42 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries Now just remember that password. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Martijn Hoekstra <martijnhoeks...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gryllida <gryll...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, at 0:02, rupert THURNER wrote: >> > for the password policy: display a strength indicator is great. anything >> > more? i would say just leave it to the user. >> > >> > rupert. >> >> THANK YOU. My thoughts exactly. :-) >> >> Everyone who has a thought should write it on-wiki for these people to >> hear you without manually scanning a mailing list. Thanks. >> >> gry >> > > I once saw a "can be brute forced on commodity hardware in x" field instead > of an abstract "strength" field - but phrased less techy. I liked that. > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l