a similar research has been done about Iran by university of Pennsylvania

http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/fileLibrary/PDFs/CItation_Filtered_Wikipedia_Report_11_5_2013-2.pdf

it's really interesting :)


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2/19/14, Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]> wrote:
> > An analysis of Syrian internet censorship shows Wikimedia sites among the
> > top 10 censored domains. See Table 5 on page 6.
> >
> > The data they're analyzing is the filtering proxy logs from October 2011,
> > so a lot's changed in our systems since then; for instance, the section
> on
> > page 7 regarding HTTPS traffic might be completely inapplicable to us
> now.
> > But I figured it was worth passing around.
> >
> > Paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.3401.pdf , found via
> > http://boingboing.net/2014/02/18/detailed-analysis-of-syrias.html .
> > "Censorship in the Wild: Analyzing Web Filtering in Syria" by Abdelberi
> > Chaabane, Mathieu Cunche, Terence Chen, Arik Friedman, Emiliano De
> > Cristofaro, and Mohammed-Ali Kafaar.
> >
> >
> > Sumana Harihareswara
> > Engineering Community Manager
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> I only skimmed the paper, but interestingly all the charts mention
> wikimedia.org being censored, not wikipedia.org. I imagine that means
> they are censoring pictures/videos rather than actual articles
> (presumably.).
>
> --bawolff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>



-- 
Amir
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to