To take a couple of steps back...

This happened because testing isn't robust enough?

That should be discussed and followed up on.



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tyler Romeo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Steven Walling <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > If your patch causes a serious UX regression like this, it's going to
> get
> > > reverted. The core patch involved was being deployed to Wikimedia
> sites /
> > > impacting MobileFrontEnd users today. If we had more time in the
> > deployment
> > > cycle to wait and the revert was a simple disagreement, then waiting
> > would
> > > be appropriate. It is obvious in this case no one tested the core
> change
> > on
> > > mobile. That's unacceptable.
> > >
> >
> > You quoted my email, but didn't seem to read it. Changes to MediaWiki
> core
> > should not have to take into account extensions that incorrectly rely on
> > its interface, and a breakage in a deployed extension should result in an
> > undeployment and a fix to that extension, not a revert of the core patch.
> >
>
> Changes to MediaWiki core should avoid breaking Wikipedia in production,
> especially since we aggressively push new versions of core and extensions
> to Wikipedia every few weeks.
>
> For years and years and years we've been very free about reverting things
> that break. No one, including old-timers like me and Tim, has the "right"
> to not have something reverted. If it needs to be reverted it will be
> reverted -- there is nothing personal in a revert. Remember it can always
> be put back once all problems are resolved.
>
> Is there anything specific in the communications involved that you found
> was problematic, other than a failure to include a backlink in the initial
> revert?
>
> -- brion
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>



-- 
-george william herbert
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to