Le 07/03/2014 07:55, MZMcBride a écrit : > Tim Starling wrote: >> >I would never have merged it, because it had a -1 from Steven Walling, >> >apparently speaking on behalf of others on design-l. I think changes >> >should be made by consensus. > > The change also had five +1s, as noted in this thread. I find it > interesting that, to you, consensus now includes a liberum veto. I'm fine > with a temporary revert if the change was causing an issue in production, > but the overall goal and execution seems fine to me.
X oppose and Y approve is not a consensus. X+Y approve is. So a single -1 should prevent a change from being submitted until that -1 is lifted by addressing the person concern(s) or correcting him/her or whatever. -- Antoine "hashar" Musso _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
