New rule: calling badger is synonymous with asking for the moderation bit
for yourself.

-Chad
On Mar 8, 2014 1:42 PM, "Brandon Harris" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>                 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Tyler Romeo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ryan Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes! This is a _good_ thing. Developers should feel responsible for what
> >> they build. It's shouldn't be operation's job to make sure the site is
> >> stable for code changes. Things should go more in this direction, in
> fact.
> >>
> >
> > If you want to give me root access to the MediaWiki production cluster,
> > then I'll start being responsible for the stability of the site.
> >
> > Tell me something, what about the developers of MariaDB? Should they be
> > responsible for WMF's stability? If they accidentally release a buggy
> > version, are they expected to revert it within hours so that the WMF
> > operations team can redeploy? Or will the operations team actually test
> new
> > releases first, and refuse to update until things start working again?
> >
> > *-- *
> > *Tyler Romeo*
> > Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
> > Major in Computer Science
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> ---
> Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation
>
> Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to