On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote:
> The Gerrit installation at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org is currently a > critical part of Wikimedia's development infrastructure. I think it's > becoming increasingly clear that Gerrit needs love. To me, this means: > > * working with upstream to make incremental improvements to Gerrit (such > as the great work that Christian A. and Chad H. have done) and having at > least one person dedicated to general upkeep of our Gerrit installation; or > > * figuring out whether a different solution such as Phabricator makes > sense (expensive and fraught). > > The Wikimedia Foundation currently has staff or contractors dedicated to > maintaining human resources software and Bugzilla, but perhaps it could > spare the additional resources for a person dedicated to Gerrit or another > code review tool. Or this is possibly an area where a Wikimedia Chapter > could provide support. > This is partially being discussed systematically under the umbrella of the Project Management Tools Review work, described at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project_management_tools/Review. People should participate in the discussions there, particularly at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project_management_tools/Review/Options and the associated Talk page. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
