On 05.04.2014, 21:27 Jeroen wrote: > Hey,
>> Are you simply looking for a revert > Not of the whole commit. Just the wfDeprecated call. > I seem to remember that at one point the policy was to add a @deprecated > tag, and then two releases later or so add the wfDeprecated call. Actually > I made some commits which violated this policy and then got reverted. > With this approach extension authors can retain compatibility with the last > few versions without doing ugly things and without running into piles of > notices. Then when 1.25 comes they can do a search and replace and bump > their min mw version to 1.23. That saves both the extension devs a lot of > hassle, and does not throw the users of those extensions under the bus > either. Sounds reasonable to me --> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/124130 -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
