Bartosz Dziewoński <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we totally should do this, but with a really long expiration period > (3 months suggested by Brian seem nice).
> The concerns raised by a few people here are valid, but I think they could be > offset with some simple improvements: > * Never re-abandon a patchset that has been previously restored (note that I > mean patchset, not changeset). > * Send a notice (a comment) on the patch that it will be abandoned, > explaining why we do this and how to prevent it. > How about this? What are the benefits? If someone is overwhelmed by changes in -1 in his dash- board(s), it sounds odd that they would want to exclude only changes older than three months when they could exclude all of them. Tim _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
