(anonymous) wrote: >> I don't like this idea, for the same reasons that other have already >> given. Grafting histories with git-replace might be viable, but it'd still >> be clunky and non-intuitive.
> Ok, fair enough. Everyone's made some really good points so let's drop the > idea of dropping our history. > However I think we should continue to discuss ways to contain the repo size > going forward. That, combined with some aggressive repacking and dropping > of refs/changes/* (when we move to Phabricator) should help get it under > control. > [...] Just to clarify: refs/changes/* = Gerrit patchsets (minus the ones referenced as submitted changes)? If so, sure, they're only scratchpads, but on the other hand they should- n't affect the size of a default clone that just pulls in the parents of master's HEAD? Tim _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
