>
> * User talk pages. Do we need multithread tree discussions in our user
talk
> pages? No, we don't.
>
> * Regular talk pages. In most cases a section gets 2-5 replies at most.
The

I think you mean on average. There are outliers here, and they aren't that
uncommon. That said i agree that in general user talk page discussions are
simple, and the whose talk do i respond at is a big issue there.

That said, i still hate user talk pages that use lqt. Maybe flow will
convert me one day into a believer, but it hasn't yet.

> benefit of a simple entry point for newcomers and junior editors clearly
> surpasses the potential inconvenience for some vets, especially if our
> priority is to be welcoming and open to diversity of people and opinions.

Diversity and all that jazz is great. But that is a means to an end, not an
end in itself. The point of a talk page in not inherently to be welcoming.
Its not a party or a space primarily for socialization. The point is to
come to conclusions on how to make a better article. Now diversity of
opinion is important to that, but i think its important to separate ends
and means. If the increase in welcomingness makes them less suited to their
actual purpose, that would be bad.

I think an apt comparison would be to a conference. Being welcoming is
important, but if that's all you are, its not really a conference.

>
> * Forums open to new / junior editors like
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Support_desk . If you notice the
> number of replies per thread, you will see that almost always they keep
> themselves under 10 posts, so I don't envision major problems if we move
> those to Flow as well.

Yes. Lqt has proven itself here to be useful.

>
> * Hardcore forums for insiders. I wonder if there is any using LQT
> nowadays, the ones that come to mind are based on pure Wikitext, and in
> fact they are not even in a *Talk namespace. Therefore, even if Flow would
> be powering 100% of the talk pages in Wikimedia wikis, it would be still a
> decision of these forums to decide whether they want to stay with Wikitext
> or use Flow.
>
>

--bawolff
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to