Yes, those plus a few others. Yes WMF counsel can't act as Cascadia's counsel but I would want to see what terms WMF might offer like indemnifying Cascadia for any issues relating to archiving the Commons content.
Pine On Aug 2, 2014 5:32 PM, "Jeremy Baron" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 2, 2014 8:25 PM, "Pine W" <[email protected]> wrote: > > No offense, I would prefer that Cascadia discuss potential legal issues > > privately with WMF before we start speculating in public. > > > > There is probably a way to make this successful in the end. > > I find that rather confusing. > > As the legal team's email footers say, they are not your lawyer (and not > your chapter's lawyer either). > > I can't think of any legal issues you'd encounter besides the ones WMF > already deals with. (copyright/trademark/defamation/trade secrets/national > security/CDA 230/DMCA/etc.) If you want legal advice on any of those issues > then you need to consult counsel outside WMF. > > Or maybe there's a concern I haven't imagined yet. > > -Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
