Core API can be misleading since people may think other APIs are based on MW's API (i.e. It's core of other APIs) even though It's true in some cases but not necessarily for all.
Am I wrong? Best On 8/7/14, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:15 PM, James Forrester <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Yes, this is sensible. Let's certainly not call it "the MediaWiki API" >> given how many are planned. > > "Core" seems a reasonable qualifier, though, no? Seems like the > content API and a lot of other proposed interfaces are by definition > outside the core. So why not MW core API or just core API for short? > > -- > Erik Möller > VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Amir _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
