On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Ryan Lane <rlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, svetlana <svetl...@fastmail.com.au> > wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > I am reading https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Migration and it > > says: > > > > "A review of our project management tools [1] was started, including an > > assessment of our needs and requirements, and a discussion of available > > options. A request for comment [2] was set up to gauge interest in > > simplifying our development toolchain and consolidating our tools > (gitblit, > > Gerrit, Jenkins, Bugzilla, RT, Trello, and Mingle) into Phabricator. The > > result of the RFC was in favor of Phabricator." > > > > The RFC linked is > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator . It is > > clearly put wrong. People were not given alternatives. They were told > > "let's move to Phabricator" and they said "OK, let's do that". I am > > frustrated. Decide on X, open a "let's do X", get support - this is not > how > > decisions are done. > > > > Would anyone oppose me writing another RFC detailing all the available > > options (including staying with bugzilla and what cons it has) and > posting > > an URL to it here? > > > > > The RFC was open for quite some time. You missed the comment period, which > is unfortunate, but the decision has already been made and work is already > underway to switch. > > - Ryan See the navbox, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
