On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Micru, > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 11:45 +0200, David Cuenca wrote: > > Wouldn't be better to have nested projects? GsoC might need a project > per > year with subprojects for each student to manage their task, is project > > nesting possible on Phabricator? > What you are proposing is exactly what we plan to do right now with FOSS OPW Round 9 projects (deadline for submissions: today). https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T564 Subprojects are not (yet) supported in Phabricator. > Upstream ticket: https://secure.phabricator.com/T3670 Tagging describes Phabricator projects a lot better than nesting. In Phabricator, projects are tags and tags are projects. This means that even if the "subproject" concept is officially missing today, you can organize your work in a similar way. > And what about sister projects? Will each one have a project? > > A task in Phabricator can have between zero and unlimited associated > projects. (This is different from Bugzilla where a ticket must have > exactly one product and exactly one component.) > Exactly. If sister projects want to have Phabricator projects, they could have them. But there us hundreds of them, so we better coordinate first. David, thank you for providing a good excuse to create this task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T802 See you there! ;) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
