On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Derric Atzrott <[email protected]> wrote: >> Indeed - I am somewhat surprised by James's firm opposition. > > I tend to agree with James on this one in that if the edit summaries > are to be modified then they need a revision history. > >> Typos in edit summary are fixed by releasing an errata corrige in a >> subsequent dummy edit. > > I question whether or not the ability to change edit summaries is > really a needed feature though. I would prefer the approach that > Nemo recommend of making a dummy edit. This would work a little better if we had the feature requested on https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33943 (Grouping edit history). But I don't see a reason against https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13937 (Correcting edit summaries (if own, last, & recent))
Helder _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
