> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, at 19:25, Anthony Cole wrote: >> On Wed Nov 12 01:05:26 UTC 2014 I asked this list if the technical team >> could help the patrollers of recent changes to Wikipedia's medical articles >> “...tag the log entry of revisions ... as having been reviewed for >> policy/guideline compliance by a trusted editor.” [1] >> >> I am quite technically illiterate and may have misunderstood, but judging >> by Yusuke Matsubara's description, the extension he mentions above seems >> like it might fit our needs. Will it enable patrollers to add a comment to >> the edit summary? Does anyone know if it works on en.Wikipedia? >> >> 1.https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-November/079418.html
I don't think it is promising to use the RevisionCommentSupplement extension for a kind of revision tagging in the manner described. For example, the extension doesn't have the functionality of filtering RecentChanges by appended summaries. The intended use case is re-explain the individual edit so that humans (readers) can better understand it. A more promising approach might be (re-)using "tags" [1] - AbuseFilter and a few other tools (such as HHVM) add tags to revisions, and RecentChanges can (already) be filtered by tags. Is there an implementation that allows editors with certain privilege to add/remove a certain tag to a chosen revision? Is it easy to create one? [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Tags Best, Yusuke On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:15 PM, svetlana <[email protected]> wrote: > - I think this ML top-posts. Not sure. > - Suspect that the Flow extension would allow for more flexibility, including > attaching multiple discussion threads to a specific edit or paragraph. > > -- > svetlana > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, at 19:25, Anthony Cole wrote: >> (Sorry, I posted this in the wrong thread a few minutes ago.) >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Yusuke Matsubara <whym at whym.org >> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l>> wrote: >> >** On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Amir E. Aharoni >> **>* <amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il >> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l>> wrote: >> *>>* I tried looking for it in Bugzilla; I expected to find a two-digit bug >> for >> *>>* it, but I couldn't find any at all. Of course it's possible that I >> didn't >> *>>* look well enough. >> *>>* A bit different, but there is an extension that enables >> *>* "supplementing" additional non-modifiable edit summaries: >> *>* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RevisionCommentSupplement >> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RevisionCommentSupplement> >> *>>* It was contributed (without a Bugzilla request) by Burthsceh, a >> *>* volunteer at Japanese Wikipedia, prompted by the necessity to fix >> *>* attributions made in edit summaries (for reused texts). [1] I don't >> *>* think it has been extensively reviewed, though. >> *>>* With that approach, you could effectively modify an edit summary by >> *>* appending a modified one and rev-deleting the original one. >> *>>* [1] >> https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%95%E6%88%B8%E7%AB%AF/subj/%E5%B1%A5%E6%AD%B4%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%81%AE%E5%80%8B%E3%80%85%E3%81%AE%E7%89%88%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%BE%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E8%BF%BD%E5%8A%A0%E3%81%AE%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E8%A1%A8%E7%A4%BA%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%E3%81%AE%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88 >> <https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%95%E6%88%B8%E7%AB%AF/subj/%E5%B1%A5%E6%AD%B4%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%81%AE%E5%80%8B%E3%80%85%E3%81%AE%E7%89%88%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%BE%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E8%BF%BD%E5%8A%A0%E3%81%AE%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E8%A1%A8%E7%A4%BA%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%E3%81%AE%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88> >> * >> >> >> On Wed Nov 12 01:05:26 UTC 2014 I asked this list if the technical team >> could help the patrollers of recent changes to Wikipedia's medical articles >> “...tag the log entry of revisions ... as having been reviewed for >> policy/guideline compliance by a trusted editor.” [1] >> >> I am quite technically illiterate and may have misunderstood, but judging >> by Yusuke Matsubara's description, the extension he mentions above seems >> like it might fit our needs. Will it enable patrollers to add a comment to >> the edit summary? Does anyone know if it works on en.Wikipedia? >> >> 1.https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-November/079418.html >> >> >> Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
