Le 26/11/2014 03:45, James Forrester a écrit :
> A handful of repos are so important and high-profile that we can use an
> acronym without too much worry, like "MW" for MediaWiki or "VE" for
> VisualEditor.
What is the point of opening a discussion if some people already
rushed/enforced their decisions ?
> For the rest, we need to make sure we've got a good enough
> name that won't cause inconveniences or confusion, and doesn't repeat the
> mistakes we've identified over time. We've learnt since the SVN to git
> migration a few years ago that calling your repository "/core" is a bad
> plan, for instance.
{in your opinion}, I think `/core` is just fine.
>
> [[mw:Phabricator/Diffusion/Callsign_naming_conventions]]
> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Diffusion/Callsign_naming_conventions>
Can we take sometime to clean up the repositories, there are a lot of
obsolete/abandoned ones that I would love to see disappear or archived
somewhere else.
For the Gerrit hierarchy 'integration/*', please have who ever is
leading the project to fill a task for the #contint project. Some repos
need to be renamed / changed.
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
