Three short notes: - The G-prefix has on major advantage: it keeps the 'root namespace' (i.e. the first letter) clean: at the moment only A C E G L M O P S W are in use, so adding another prefix 'B' is easy. If we already have repositories that start with a B, it's more confusing.
- Being a bit more flexible with the length seems OK to me, but I would not do this for large namespaces (e.g. G and E). For 'the most important repository in a namespace', using a shorter callsign makes sense. So yes to MW, no to GVE and EVE. If it's important enough to be shorter, it's important enough to have it's own prefix. - A seperate prefix for VE is sensible if a larger set of repositories are expected. GVED vs VEMW will be a bit confusing, though, so I'd suggest VEMW rather than EVED in that case. Merlijn On 29 November 2014 at 20:33, Nikolas Everett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2014 1:58 PM, "Legoktm" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On the talk page I suggested dropping the "G" prefix for top-level >> repos, and just giving them an unprefixed callsign. I think that would >> fix the ugliness of some of the frequently used names. >> >> >> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:51:11 +0100, Chad <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> >> The only exception I'd make is MediaWiki. Under this >> >>> scheme the callsign is MWMW. MediaWiki should be >> >>> just plain MW. >> >> If we rename "mediawiki/core" to just "mediawiki" it becomes a top-level >> repo and can just be "MW". >> >> > On 29 November 2014 at 09:13, Bartosz Dziewoński <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Feels slippery. Next thing you know, someone will want VE and SMW. :) >> >> If the "VisualEditor/VisualEditor" repo becomes "VisualEditor" I don't >> see anything against naming it "VE". >> >> On 11/29/14 9:26 AM, James Forrester wrote: >> > When we have VE-WordPress and VE-Drupal and VE-Joomla and whatever, > we'll >> > put them as… GVEW, GVED, GVEJ *etc.* and just hope we never have a first >> > character clash on integrations? >> >> I think we would set up VE as a prefix rather than dumping them under >> general, so: VEWP, VEDP, VEJM (or whatever). >> >> -- Legoktm > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
