Daniel Kinzler wrote: >Anyone want to discuss any of the other RFCs? > >If not, how about we just declare them closed/stalled/abandoned or >whatever?
Why? It's unclear to me what this would accomplish. I'm pretty strongly in favor of treating RFCs the same way that we treat bugs (now tasks): they live or die by their merits alone. It's largely irrelevant who the author is or when the last activity was. What's important is whether the RFC covers a reasonable, implement-able idea. I'd much rather see energy put into finding volunteers to help move these RFCs forward than I would see energy put into closing down discussions. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
