Krinkle <krinklemail <at> gmail.com> writes: > > I'm not sure we should implement collapsible sections for desktop. > > If built and instrumented, one may find that users use it a fair bit and it may be better-than-nothing as > solution for certain use cases. But I don't think collapsible sections would be an adequate feature for > those use cases. > > Our table of contents is in desperate need of improvement. Having that be more accessible throughout the > reading experience would be a big step forward[1] (much like the Wikipedia iOS app). Having a proper TOC > means users don't have to collapse/expand anything. > > This would allow users to have a birds eye view of the document at all times, jump to any section at any time, > whilst still being able to scroll through the document top to bottom as one would expect. > > From a performance viewpoint (as opposed to usability) we can still do optimisations such as not loading > images until a section is accessed (lazy-load). >
What is the differences between an extension and a gadget? Eallan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
