Special page inclusions shouldn't be able to do anything privileged;
they're meant for public data. If that's not being enforced right now I'd
recommend reworking or killing the special page inclusion system...

-- brion
On Feb 3, 2015 10:11 AM, "Brad Jorsch (Anomie)" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Jackmcbarn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'd be inclined to unstrip the marker *and squash HTML to plaintext*,
> > > then
> > > > encode the plaintext...
> > >
> > > I don't see how that addresses the security issue.
> >
> > Rollback tokens in the Special:Contributions HTML would then not be
> > available in the squashed text that got encoded. Thus it could not be
> > extracted and used in the timing attack.
> >
>
> While it would avoid *this* bug, it would still allow the attack if there
> is ever sensitive data on some transcludable special page that isn't
> embedded in HTML tag attributes.
>
>
> --
> Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
> Software Engineer
> Wikimedia Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to