Thanks Robert for the corrections on my math. I sent this late in a long long day as it has been on my to do list for some time so these numbers could be discussed. Sadly my brain was obviously not up to it's usual standards.
Glad you were able to make sense of the numbers and correct them :) On 28 Apr 2015 8:39 pm, "Robert Rohde" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 28 April 2015 at 20:00, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > > > Details on the queries I ran: > > > In March for a 26 day period before the change: > > > * 170,948 total edits [1] > > > * 169,845 non-anonymous edits [6] > > > ** by 40,658 distinct users [7] > > > * 26,617 users completely their first ever edit [11] > > > * 9,528 errors [8] > > > * 219,012 accounts created on mobile [12] > > > > > > For a similar 26 day period in April > > > * 263,986 total edits [2] > > > * 136,079 non-anonymous edits [4] > > > ** by 26,823 distinct users [5] > > > * 15,109 users completely their first ever edit [10] > > > * 58,394 errors [9] > > > * 419,976 accounts created on mobile [13] > > > > Like Anne, I also find your math incoherent. > > Relative change is generally expressed ( (new_amount) - (old_amount) ) / > (old_amount) > > Assuming the above numbers are the correct totals, then it would seem that: > > * All edits up 54% > * Edits from logged in users down 20% > * Errors up 510% > * First edits by logged in users down 43% > * New account creation up by 92% > > -Robert Rohde > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
