Hi, yes, my comments had a broader scope than the original purpose of the thread. I'm not planning to discuss that further here.
Pine On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Antoine Musso <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 20/05/2015 00:20, Pine W a écrit : > > Hmm, I'm not sure that I'd agree that everything that WMF does has a > > community aspect. There's been a lot of discussion about readership that > to > > me seems primarily concerned with fundraising and only secondly concerned > > with recruiting new contributors and otherwise serving the community. > (I'm > > not opposed to fundraising, I just want to clarify that community support > > is a step removed from the interest in readership.) There's also the open > > question of what to do with the millions of dollars in WMF reserves, and > > whether current grantmaking and affiliation policies and processes are > > actually hindering progress in certain areas, as we discussed a bit at > the > > Wikimedia Conference and elsewhere; thankfully it sounds like Grantmaking > > is going to go through a community consultation this year, and I hope to > > see some rethinking of current policies and practices. > > > > Pine > > Hello Pine, > > That is largely out of the list purpose. I invite you to bring that to > a different trol^H^H^H^H list or ask your question directly to WMF: > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Contact_us > > Thanks! > > -- > Antoine "hashar" Musso > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
