Hey Greg! Yes, this is meant to be a one-time process. We've been spending a significant proportion of our time on it ever since we joined in mid-April (I'd say about 30% for me, and probably more for Joel)—too much to make it a regular thing. And hopefully, if we manage to address these problems, we won't find them replaced by new ones the very next quarter :)
Thanks for the question—it feels great to know that someone is out there reading our child of the mind! ————— Neil P. Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF>, product analyst Wikimedia Foundation +1 (202) 656 3457 On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > <quote name="Neil P. Quinn" date="2015-06-05" time="16:56:07 -0700"> > > Hello everybody! > > > > For the past couple months, Joel Aufrecht and I have been working on a > > project to document and improve the VisualEditor team's processes; we > > just published a draft of our report > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/2015_Process_Review> on > > mediawiki.org. If you're interested, please read it over and, of > > course, shout at us on the talk page if we wrote anything stupid. > > > Neil et al, this is great! Thanks for the very informative read, even as > someone who works closely with the VE team on a semi-daily basis (at > least!). I think it is great that the time and energy was devoted to > developing this report. > > The plan at [0] suggests that this is a one-time process with a > conclusion (which is good), thus it isn't tied in, explicitly, with the > quarterly goal planning process, correct? > > > Best, > > Greg > > [0] < > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/2015_Team_Process_Review#Plans > > > > -- > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
