Brian Wolff wrote: >I dont know about that. Viz editor is targeting ordinary tasks. Its the >complex things that mess stuff up.
In most contexts, solving the ordinary/common cases is a pretty big win. >Failing fast and loud is good in lots of contexts. I dont think wiki >editing is one of them. The only cited example of real breakage so far has been mismatched <div>s. How often are you or anyone else adding <div>s to pages? In my experience, most users rely on MediaWiki templates for any kind of complex markup. Echoing my initial reply in this thread, I still don't really understand what behaviors from Tidy we want to keep. I've been following <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89331> a bit and it also hasn't helped answer this question. >Afaik, anchors are disallowed because spammers commonly insert them. Its >trivial to sanitize and allow them if we so desired. Spammers can trivially insert anchors (links). Additional wrapper markup isn't even needed; we automatically render hyperlinks if a string has a prefix that looks like it might be a URL. In any case, this is the subject of <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T35886>. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
