On 15 September 2015 at 08:26, James Forrester <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 at 08:10, Mark Holmquist <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: >> > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:10 -0500, Mark Holmquist wrote: >> > Are these questions listed on some UploadWizard wikipage/section? >> > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback says >> > "To resolve issues, it helps us to have exact steps to reproduce" so >> > I'd love that sentence to link to such "basic" debugging questions. >> >> I don't know if there's a "common questions" link anywhere. I could write >> it. I guess I just did. >> >> I honestly don't think that page is very useful, it gets a lot of noise >> and >> not much signal, which is why I don't usually look at it. We could change >> the config to point at Phabricator, maybe? >> > > Yeah, maybe dropping the feedback tool link from UW might make sense, or > at least, turning the target page into a system better suited for tracking > things (we use Flow for VE/F which works quite well as we can show which > things are resolved). > Follow-up: In chatting with Steinsplitter on IRC, we agreed to replace the link with a Phabricator one for the time being: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112666 Hopefully this will help ease things! Yours, -- James D. Forrester Lead Product Manager, Editing Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [email protected] | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
