For small and simple wikis shared hosting is still the best option: *it's cheap *it's easy to mantain *it can become pretty fast IMHO shared hosting support shouldn't be dropped.
Vito 2015-09-26 23:14 GMT+02:00 Isarra Yos <[email protected]>: > On 24/09/15 17:46, Daniel Barrett wrote: > >> Brian Wolff writes: >> >>> I feel like the types of people who use shared hosting are very unlikely >>> to be following this list. >>> >> I am one of those people. I happily use shared hosting for MediaWiki >> because (1) it is very cheap and (2) I don't have to maintain the OS. >> >> DanB >> > > I used shared hosting initially. Another thing it was very good for was > processing power - it could actually handle intensive tasks like > instantcommons or semantic queries fairly well. When I switched to > dedicated initially (this was a very crappy one a few years back) I > couldn't use instantcommons at all because it just didn't have the needed > power. > > -I > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
