Le 12/11/2015 17:35, C. Scott Ananian a écrit : > Hashar: I think your criticisms of git-review might be out of date. On my > debian system, "sudo apt-get install git-review" was sufficient to install > a version of git review which is adequate for all my needs (I have never > noticed any of the "known issues" you mention). And "git review -s" is a > one-step way to set up the proper remotes and etc and leave you ready to > use it. I am in the habit of typing "git review -u" since I noticed that > sometimes it doesn't update its remotes, but I'm guessing that's more habit > than necessity. None of the other steps you describe seem to be necessary. > --scott
Hello, Yeah that was merely a rant about the state of git-review back when we switched from svn to git. I spent countless hours getting folks to set it up properly :( The Debian/Ubuntu packages nowadays provides sufficiently recent versions and indeed apt-get install is probably the easiest way to get it installed. I am diverging, but I run it from HEAD which is something like: --- git clone ssh://review.openstack.org:29418/openstack-infra/git-review.git cd git-review pip install --user --develop . export PATH=$PATH:~/.local/bin --- So whenever I checkout a new commit, the command points to the new code base :-) YMMV -- Antoine "hashar" Musso _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
