One of the key reasons I use and recommend LTS is that upgrading version to
version can sometimes be a nightmare. Off hand I can think of the composer
and skin repo changes that each took 1-2 hours to figure out and fix. Many
of the users who use MediaWiki on either intranets or lesser hosting sites
do not have a lot in regards to knowledge/support. Getting them to upgrade
every two years is hard enough, let alone every six months. Having a stable
platform that can be recommended as an easy go to, can be key in whether
mediawiki is chosen or a different platform is picked. Ops teams dont want
to be messing with testing and deploying updates every 6 months, as it will
become a time sink. A LTS option enables minor updates that only take a few
minutes to deploy, and 1/4 the number of upgrades.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:25 AM Legoktm <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think it would be helpful if other people who use LTS could share
> > their motivations for doing so, and if the release/security teams could
> > share what issues make LTS release support problematic or difficult (a
> > few things have been mentioned on IRC, but I'll let those people speak
> > for themselves).
> >
> >
> The main problem with supporting LTS in security releases is after they
> start to get old, backporting of those patches becomes a real chore for
> each release. 1.19 especially required a *lot* of wrangling on each
> release to get things back-portable because of the amount of code that
> had changed in the meantime. Most of the comments I've made re:
> LTSes have happened when working on a nasty backport so take them
> with a grain of salt.
>
> This should not be a problem though. The release pipeline needs more
> cleanup and automation so we don't have to worry about backporting
> unless it actually causes conflicts (save the human labor for things a
> script can't figure out).
>
> If I can find the cycles to fix this, 95% of my complaint with an LTS goes
> away. The other 5% is ideological and I can deal with it ;-)
>
> -Chad
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to