> Have you looked at using OAuth for authentication? Yes; the modules in use support OAuth but we made a conscious decision to support anonymity. Lack of anonymity can interfere with the operation of the reviewer reputation database.
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote: > An Outreachy candidate for http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Accuracy_review who > went ahead and started unpaid has been making good progress, and is about > to land the central guts of the project on github. It's a new way to > transition from creating to maintaining Wikipedia articles, with an > emphasis on detecting outdated statistics, fighting bias including paid > advocacy of all kinds, and proofreading WEP student work. It's been going > slow, mostly because the original trial run architecture was too dependent > on email. > > However, before she gets there, could one or two people who are maybe > beginner or intermediate with Python but advanced with Mediawiki or PHP > please test her user authentication and login framework? > > https://github.com/priyankamandikal/wikireview/ > <https://github.com/priyankamandikal/wikireview/issues> > > It's built for PythonAnywhere because it shouldn't run on Wikimedia > servers, because of the safe harbor DMCA provisions precluding editorial > control by web hosts. Please report any issues on github and note your > results on the Phabricator task to prevent duplication of effort. > > Thanks in advance! > > Best regards, > Jim Salsman > > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
