On a somewhat serious note, I'm a big fan of enabling pig Latin as a language variant in enwiki. It would allow out SFO developers to familiarize themselves with how language converter works, in a script they can (mostly) read and understand. It also is *almost but not quite* reversible (consider "ashway", which could correspond to both "wash" and "ash"), another property it had in common with many real script transliterations (often one script will have upper/lowercase distinctions which are not written in the other script, for example), so it is a useful test case when thinking about how visual editor (say) ought to work with variants.
So while you enjoy your igpay atinlay today, spare a thought or two for the real internationalization issues it resembles. --scott On Apr 1, 2016 11:44 AM, "Ryan Kaldari" <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Due to popular demand, I've implemented a patch to dynamically convert all > Wikipedia content into Pig Latin. Give it a try and let me know what you > think: > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/280927/ > > Note that this implementation is language agnostic, but it works best with > Latin scripts. For those of you looking for support for Pig Latin as a > language variant, try Liangent's patch instead: > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/72053/ > > Cheers, > Kaldari > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
