On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
> The corruption I hypothesised is avoided because by design, page styles > modules may not have dependencies. If a module 'foo' ignores that design > requirement and changes regardless to require 'bar', then that change is in > error and should be reverted. > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/258662/ comes to mind, although you could play semantic games there with respect to what exactly depends on what since it seems pretty hard for a CSS file in isolation to actually depend on another CSS file versus the HTML output that uses the first CSS file also requiring the second for proper rendering. -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Senior Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
