No! Quality rapidly decreases when you force unpaid people to rush reviewing so the queue looks better. Last time people rushed pywikibot reviewers, lots of junk was committed, creating lots of bugs, and the tree has been red for months now, making it more difficult to merge old large changesets. Busy work. By unpaid people. Because paid people complain about the queue. We recently lost a very good reviewer & +2'er, putting a large spanner in the system. But other than that you will see pywikibot has been very active . On 13 May 2016 04:17, "Jon Robson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm keen for us give attention to people who have open patchsets that > they are looking for review. We had the first code review office hours > today and I hope in the long term during this hour we can work on > reviewing patchsets from this search: > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/(+label:Code-Review%253D0+OR+NOT+(label:Code-Review%253D-1+OR+label:Code-Review%253D-2)+),n,z > > Pywikibot has 145 open patches on Gerrit. > You can see them all here: > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:pywikibot/core+(+label:Code-Review%253D0+OR+NOT+(label:Code-Review%253D-1+OR+label:Code-Review%253D-2)+),n,z > > Can someone who is familiar with this codebase commit to helping > getting all these reviewed? > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
