On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, rupert THURNER <[email protected]> wrote:
> quim, i would not be angry if you would show a little bit more empathy > towards a client, a volunteer. if mzmcbride is right and there is a > well established procedure to change this page which was not followed, > the person not following might read the "expected behaviour" page. > putting the blame on the person harrassed/frustrated (mzmcbride), not > on the harrasser (whoever changed the page) seems not a nice move in > that case. > I don't think it's accurate or helpful to describe technical changes made in good faith as "harassment" (regardless of the merits of the change). _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
