Am 12.07.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Jaime Crespo:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Daniel Kinzler
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yea, still something we need to figure out :)
> 
>> That was, if I remember correctly, one of the arguments for using readable
>> strings there, instead of int values and a config variable, as I originally
>> proposed. This was discussed at the last Berlin hackathon, must have been 
>> 2012.
>> Tim may remember more details. We should probably re-consider the pros and 
>> cons
>> we discussed back then when planning to change the scham now.
> 
> But that was already re-reviewed and discussed and approved by Tim
> himself (among others) on 2015:
> <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meetbot/wikimedia-office/2015/wikimedia-office.2015-07-29-20.59.html>.


Yes, I saw that. And I'm happy about it! But the aspect of maintainance and
tooling seems to be completely absent from the discussion and proposal. From a
DB perspective, looks fine. I just feel it is missing a few crucial bits. Like,
how does anything ever get into these tables?

-- daniel

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to