Thanks Gabriel, Jaime. It worked OK and it seems to be as fast as you
commented!

El 04/08/16 a les 23:34, Gabriel Wicke ha escrit:
> Toni, we heavily use caching to speed up the REST API, so making individual
> requests is the fastest way to retrieve content. You can use parallelism to
> achieve your desired throughput, and with HTTP/2 all those parallel
> requests can even share a single TCP connection. The request limit for the
> API overall is 200 req/s, as documented in
> https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/?doc.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jaime Crespo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry, I am not sure 100%, if that is true, maybe creating a feature
>> request may help suggesting its implementation?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Toni Hermoso Pulido <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks Jaime, so it only works with Action (MediaWiki default) API so
>>> far, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> El 08/04/2016 a les 10:07 AM, Jaime Crespo ha escrit:
>>>> Hi, you can combine multiple pages with the "pipe" sign:
>>>>
>>>> Check:
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=
>> revisions&rvprop=content&format=jsonfm&titles=Hillary_Clinton|Donald_Trump
>>>
>>>> (change 'jsonfm' for 'json' on a real request)
>>>> There is a limit on the number of pages depending on your account
>>>> rights, but it is very helpful to avoid round-trip latencies for us in
>>>> high-latency places.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Toni Hermoso Pulido <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> is it already possible to retrieve data from different pages just by
>>>>> using one request?
>>>>>
>>>>> E.g by combining:
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/summary/Electron
>>>>> and
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/summary/Dog


-- 
Toni Hermoso Pulido
http://www.cau.cat
http://www.similis.cc

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to