If only we could plug in the gerrit back-end (via API) to the phabricator
front-end. Phabricator has a much better diff viewer and commenting
system.  Gerrit is superior in many ways but the UI is so terrible it's not
even funny.


On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Paladox <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Not really, since gerrit is a google owned project, and google supports
> most browsers, it is unlikely that Internet Explorer will never be
> unsupported in google projects unless no one uses ie or Microsoft drops all
> support for Internet Explorer.
>
>     On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 9:39, rupert THURNER <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>  Isn't Gerrit more for developers who as a consequence anyway run multiple
> browsers and therefore do not care so much that it does not support Ie?
> On Sep 26, 2016 20:14, "Paladox" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There new skin called polygerrit fixes all the issues described here. It
> is moving along greatly but it doesn't support all browsers yet, namely
> Internet Explorer due to polygerrit using es6 and internet explorer does
> not support es6. They are going to something in the q2 of next year work on
> internet explorer support, hopefully it will make it into gerrit 2.14,
> 2.15, and hopefully we will still be using gerrit then and update it and
> also hopefully polygerrit will have added all the missing features.
> Polygerrit is very responsive as I tried this on my mobile (iPhone) and it
> worked.
>
>
>
>     On Monday, 26 September 2016, 18:39, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>  On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Tim Starling <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 25/09/16 21:09, Bináris wrote:
> > > I try to familiarize myself with Gerrit which is not a good example for
> > > user-friendly interface.
> > > I noticed a letter B in the upper right corner of the screen, and I
> > > suspected it could be a portion of my login name. So I looked at it in
> > HTML
> > > source, and it was. I pushed my mouse on it and I got another half
> window
> > > as attached.
> > >
> > > So did somebody perhaps wire the size of a 25" monitor into page
> > rendering?
> > > My computer is a Samsung notebook.
> >
> > In T38471 I complained that the old version was too wide at 1163px
> > (for my dashboard on a random day). Now the new version is 1520px. I'm
> > not sure if the Gerrit folks are serious or are trolling us. Perhaps
> > it is a tactic to encourage UI code contributions?
> >
>
> My suspicion is that the Gerrit folks (in particular, Shawn Pierce) aren't
> so much trolling us as saying "stop relying on the UI of Gerrit!  That's
> not the point!"  The last time I was paying close attention to this, Gerrit
> upstream seems to be particularly focused on building code review features
> suitable for:
> 1.  Incorporation into git upstream
> 2.  Integrated into development UIs like Eclipse
>
> The strategy seems to be "Gerrit is a reference implementation of a code
> review UI for Git".  I haven't paid close enough attention to either Gerrit
> upstream or Git upstream to know if the Gerrit core contributors have made
> progress in getting code review functionality added to Git core (or if
> they've given up, or if I completely misunderstood their strategy).  I'm
> guessing that Eclipse has pretty good Gerrit support, but I rarely play
> with Eclipse, so that's just a guess based on the Eclipse Foundation's
> involvement with Gerrit.
>
> As bd808 noted, Gerrit upstream seems to be working on yet another UI,
> which would make sense if their goal is to create a variety of compatible
> implementations of advanced Git functionality.
>
> Rob
> ______________________________ _________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to