i wanted to endorse it because i like the idea - but it links to a
commercial site, ispeech.org. this confuses me a little. nothing is
mentioned about open source software in the lines of:
http://www.findbestopensource.com/tagged/text-to-speech

rupert

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:58 PM, André Costa <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the comments.
>
> The page is indeed lacking in details related to the implementation. Some
> of it may be found in the pilot study but most isn't.
>
> I've made a first answered at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki
> /Extension_talk:Wikispeech. I also copied your (Bawolff) questions there,
> hope you don't mind. I would appreciate it if the follow-up was kept there
> to make it accessible to people off-list.
>
> Thanks,
> André
>
> On 18 December 2016 at 20:49, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, December 16, 2016, André Costa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > *Cross posting on purpose, no excuses made.*
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At Wikimedia Sverige we have been working on an extension called
> > > Wikispeech. It will be a text-to-speech solution which aim to make the
> > > information on Wikipedia more accessible for people that have limited
> > > abilities to read.
> > >
> > > This is Wikimedia Sverige's first MediaWiki development project from
> > > scratch and it has been suggested to us that we should ask for
> > endorsements
> > > - as this will make the need clear if/when the extension needs support.
> > So,
> > > if you think that this sound like something important, please let
> > everybody
> > > know it! https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikispeech#Endorsement
> > >
> > > Please spread the word. Best,
> > > André Costa
> > > André Costa | Senior Developer, Wikimedia Sverige |
> > [email protected]
> > > | +46 (0)733-964574
> > >
> > > Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige.
> > > Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> >
> > I agree with nemo, a more detailed implementation plan would be very
> > welcome.
> >
> > From what I gather from your existing implementation, your current plan
> is:
> > * Using a ParserAfterParse hook, do some complex regexes/DomDocument
> > manipulation to create "utterance" annotations of clean html for the tts
> > server.
> > * insert this utterance html at end of page html
> > * javascript posts this to a (currently) python api, that returns a json
> > response that contains a url for the current utterance (not sure how long
> > an utterance is, but im assuming its about a paragraph)
> > * javascript plays the file.
> >
> > Is this your general plan, or is the existing code more a proof of
> concept?
> > Im not sure im a fan of adding extra markup in this fashion if its only
> > going to be used by a fraction of our users.
> >
> > --
> > bawolff
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to