Am 18.01.2017 um 21:45 schrieb MZMcBride: > Daniel Kinzler wrote: >> * ArchCom is considering changes to the RFC process. Discussion is >> ongoing. > > Where is discussion ongoing?
Internally. We have to decide on a MO. I'm sharing this summary here to keep you posted, and give an opportunity for input. But in the end, the committee has to decide how it wants to operate. > I don't know what primary tool means. In the past, the IRC dicussion was the only way to get an RFC discussed or approved. > There are benefits to both > asynchronous and synchronous discussions. The IRC meetings in particular > have the benefit of being scheduled and regularly recurring, which can be > a good nudge for people to finish drafting a task or wiki page, to make a > decision to accept or decline, to comment on a proposal, etc. Yes, we do see advantages, too. But it's not the best tool for all discussions, and shouldn't be the only venue of discussion. -- Daniel Kinzler Principal Platform Engineer Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
