I'd like to share this relevant blog post[0] by Joaquin for work done on the Popups extension and upcoming plans for other repos. The post discusses some of the tradeoffs of Special:JavaScriptTest tests and Node.js headless QUnit tests.
[0] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/phame/post/view/96/fast_and_isolated_js_unit_tests/ On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:05 AM Aleksey Bekh-Ivanov < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Why did you start working on that? (Task description says nothing about the > reason) > > I express my personal opinion here: > I would like it to stay like it is (running in nodejs) - it is far more > developer friendly to run nodejs tests than Special:JavaScriptTest. > And, to be honest, I would want to migrate more JS test code supported by > WMDE to nodejs. > > > On 21 July 2018 at 00:13, Antoine Musso <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > The ArticlePlaceholder extension has QUnit tests run via nodejs. I am > > trying to port them to Special:JavaScriptTest. > > > > I am hitting a wall due to an OOUi widget not being found on the first > > test. Most probably because the window is opened asynchronously and the > > assertions are run before it opens. > > > > JavaScript Promises are not my thing and I know nothing about OOUi. If > > that is in your area of expertise, I could use a hand to finish up the > > port: > > > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/444936/6 > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > -- > > Antoine "hashar" Musso > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
