Hi Pine, and thanks for the feedback! Comments are inline.
Željko On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:38 PM Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > I like having the placeholders for teams so that I can get a sense of what > teams currently exist and how they are named. SoS meeting notes are not canonical list of teams. Staff and Contractors is that page: https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/staff-contractors/ There's also SoS template with all teams, for reference, if that's useful: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/Template > However, my guess is that > these are expensive meetings in terms of dollars spent on staff time for > meeting preparation, the meetings themselves, and post-meeting > documentation and reading, so I understand the desire to weigh the value of > these meetings and to consider revisions. > I think SoS is the least expensive of similar meetings. It's usually really short, about 10 minutes and about 10 people attends it. I usually spend just a few minutes preparing notes for my team, I guess other teams spend similar amount of time. There's still room for improvement, of course. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
