Good to know it was so few people. Thanks for your diligence as always.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:57 PM Tim Starling <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 26/6/20 3:26 pm, Steven Walling wrote:
> > Thanks Tim,
> >
> > 1. Does “saw the site” mean users actually had full or partial access to
> > the accounts of other users, or simply were viewing a cached version of
> the
> > site that appeared as if they were logged in as someone else?
>
> Users reportedly had full access to the accounts of other users.
>
> > How many users were impacted?
>
> We had three reports. We've added logging which should help to
> determine whether anyone else was affected. So far, the indications
> are that it is an extremely rare event.
>
> > 2. Does the WMF hold incident review meetings and publish reports about
> > what steps are taken to prevent repeat incidents with the same root
> cause?
>
> Incidents are documented at
> <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incident_documentation>
>
> Action items are tagged with the Incident Prevention tag in Phabricator:
> <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/view/4758/>
>
> Whether there is an incident review meeting depends on the nature of
> the incident.
>
> -- Tim Starling
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to