Hello Amir,

I think that the ordering should be randomized to rule out bias, as most
people will choose to drag the least since dragging is one of the most
high-effort interactions. Otherwise, it looks pretty good.

Best,
QEDK

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_effect
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Above_the_fold
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_(cognitive_bias)

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 23:00, Amir Sarabadani <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> The second round of voting for the new logo will start soon. In this round,
> we are going to vote on different variants of the top design (Proposal
> six). Given that 16 different variants of this logo exist (with different
> wordmarks, colors, etc.), we need preferential voting instead of the
> classic support/oppose. We will use Schulze method [1] for choosing the
> final winner.
>
> I hacked together a simple voting gadget that you can test in
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Round_2?withJS=MediaWiki:Gadget-logo-voting.js
>
> Using that, you just order logos based on how much you like them (with drag
> and drop), and then click save. The votes will be saved in another page.
> Please test and let me know of any issues by the next couple of days (by
> September 25). Any edits on the gadget is also welcome. Please put your
> suggestions on its talk page if you don't have rights to edit it.
>
> Of course, voting without the gadget will be also possible, it'll be just
> slightly cumbersome.
>
> One known issue so far: The gadget on mobile doesn't work because mobile
> browsers don't listen to drag events.
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method
> Best
> --
> Amir (he/him)
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to