The minutes from TechCom's triage meeting on 21 October 2020. Present: Dan A, Tim S, Timo T. Should npm packages maintained by Wikimedia be scoped or unscoped?
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T239742 - NL: Still in inbox - TT: Seems companies do this both ways at times. Might not need a strict policy. - TS: Delegate to FSG? - TT: I'll ask Volker to bring it up in the next meeting. - Moved to Watching. RFC: Bump Firefox version in basic support to 3.6 or newer - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T262946 - Moved to Last Call. RFC: PHP microservice for containerized shell execution - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T260330 - Development is going right along. The basics have been figured out. - Still room for input on what the public interface of the MW service class would look like, and how e.g. an admin would write or generate the configuration for their Shellbox instance for the specific extensions they have (E.g. Score requires additional commands to be registered in the service). - Currently in P4. We should hear from e.g. Fandom and BlueSpice with any concerns to consider, or a confident signal that they're happy with this as it stands. Next week IRC office hours No IRC discussion scheduled for next week. You can also find our meeting minutes at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Committee/Minutes If you prefer you can subscribe to our newsletter here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Newsletter:TechCom_Radar -- Timo On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 6:12 PM Niklas Laxström <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the weekly TechCom board review in preparation of our meeting on > Wednesday. If there are additional topics for TechCom to review, please let > us know by replying to this email. However, please keep discussion about > individual RFCs to the Phabricator tickets. > > Activity since Monday 2020-10-15 on the following boards: > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/techcom/ > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/techcom-rfc/ > > Committee inbox: > > - T239742 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T239742> Should npm > packages maintained by Wikimedia be scoped or unscoped? > - Still in inbox > > Committee board activity: > > - T263904 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T263904> Are traits part > of the stable interface? > - Daniel moved to in progress (see last weeks email thread) > > New RFCs: (none) > > Phase progression: > > - T262946 Bump Firefox version in basic support to 3.6 or newer > - P3 -> P4: ready to go on last call > > IRC meeting request: (none) > > Other RFC activity: > > - T119173 RFC: Discourage use of MySQL's ENUM type > - Concerns about removing existing uses, but it doesn't seem > necessary to remove them > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
