In Hungarian it is infinite. Calling both indefinite is just as misleading, translate it anyhow. The main thing is that two block options have the same manifestation in the log (I suppose, in the database, too).
Bartosz Dziewoński <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jún. 27., Cs, 15:08): > As far as I can see, the durations of user blocks that do not expire are > consistently labelled as "indefinite" on Special:Log, at least in > English. Can you say where you see the public logging you're referring to? > > (MediaWiki mixes "indefinite" and "infinite" in some other places > though. I don't think that's intentional, the software was just written > by many different people and they didn't all worry about such details.) > > > On 2024-06-27 11:28, Bináris wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I can choose either infinite or indefinite block, it is being logged > > publicly as infinite. > > Once we have two different types, they should be logged separately. > > Indefinite blocks are ususally connected to some condition, such as > > changing an unacceptable name, and the public infinite appearance > > sometimes causes misunterstandings among users. > > Is it a bug or a feature? > > > > -- > > Bináris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/ > > -- > Bartosz Dziewoński > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/ -- Bináris
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
