> This message (imo) makes it clear that the main problem with this task in > particular was the presence of agentic AI.
I'm sorry, but that's besides the point. This is not about what tools people use. This is about what a project claims to do. The problem with the project in question (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T414881) is that it aims to change the way people edit Wikimedia Commons, and the scale at which it aims to do that. > These are/were classification tasks that, for the most part, would help > community patrollers […] There was no generative AI involved I'm afraid the project is deliberately vague about this. Personally I think this is part of the reason why it was declined. Is it about patrolling? No, probably not. It specifically says it wants to "improve the quality of the metadata of the uploaded pictures" directly during the upload process, as far as I understand it. It's suggested to generate "depictions" as well as "translations". This is not merely "classification". This is generating content. I hope this helps. Thiemo _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
