Thanks, Platonides. I know the svn command to checkout or export a directory. But I want to emphasis that the collaboration model are different between svn and git.
For example, if I want to add some test cases, I need someone to grant me the svn access. While in github, I can push my contribution back to upstream very easily, and the original author can choice what back to him. Above is just my advice, if Andreas choices svn, I will follow his change on svn also. Let's drop the irrelevant discussion on git/svn issue, and back to the main topic. Regards, Mingli On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Platonides <[email protected]> wrote: > Mingli Yuan wrote: > > Great news! > > > > Just an advice: could you commit the code into github? So we can fork > > it, play with and contribute back easily. > > Svn is not as convenient as git and the mediawiki svn repository is too > > large. > > Free software should be really free, not be bounded in a centralized > > repository. :-) > > > > Regards, > > Mingli > > svn doesn't have the git inconvenient of forcing you to checkout all or > nothing. > To get only libmwparser just run: > svn checkout > http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/parsers/libmwparser/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitext-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikitext-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
